New Manhattan Skyline: 2012.......Yes? No?

Sarcasmo

A Taste Of Honey Fluff Boy
Mar 28, 2005
34,396
464
648
46
Austin
Marklar
₥663
Here are some renderings of the Manhattan skyline as it's slated to appear upon completion in 2012. I'm curious what you think about them. It seems a lot of people love them, and just as many people hate them, though honestly I'm not sure why. Personally I think they look great, and are light years beyond the sheer fugliness that was the Twin Towers.


Horrible, fugly, sterile, minimalist rendering of the Freedom Tower's base (concrete with reinforcing steel and titanium overlay to protect from truck bombs):

28cnd-freedom.jpg





Freedom Tower's base not looking quite as bad, with people, trees, and soothing water:

newwtcplaza.jpg





GREATEST LOBBY EVER, AMIRITE???? Freedom Tower lobby looking basic but somewhat groovy:

newwtclobby.jpg





View of the escalators, which is a massive part of any architectural portfolio. Apparently.

newwtclobby2.jpg





Exterior daytime view of Freedom Tower:

Freedom-Tower-design.jpg





Evening view of Freedom Tower:

freedomtower.jpg





Skyline view of the "Fab 4" new buildings:

11.jpg





A bit more distance on the skyline view:

wtc_site20skyline.jpg





Another angle from across the river:

ftower3.jpg





Really groovy evening river shot:

night-view.jpg





Good daytime view of the entire WTC site (from left to right - Freedom Tower, 200 Greenwich, 175 Greenwich, 150 Greenwich):

Site-view.jpg





Kick ass evening rendering of same site:

Foster-7.jpg





View of the new 200 Greenwich building:

Foster-2.jpg





Streetlevel rendering of 200 Greenwich from along Fulton street:

Foster-4.jpg






Exterior shot of 175 Greenwich from Church Street:

Rogers-3.jpg





Exterior evening rendering of the lobby atrium of 175 Greenwich:

Rogers-5.jpg





Curtain wall detail of 175 Greenwich:

Rogers-6.jpg





Rendering of 175 Greenwich and 150 Greenwich from West Side Highway. 200 Greenwich can just be seen at the left, and Freedom Tower would be located just out of the shot next to that:

Rogers-4.jpg






View of 175 Greenwich from Cortlandt Street, with 200 Greenwich in the background.

Rogers-10.jpg





Montage of the rather nondescript 150 Greenwich:

Maki_opener-collage.jpg
 
Last edited:
The spire is needed to make it 1,776 feet tall. They didn't want the floorspace to rise any higher, but wanted a symbolic total height. They probably could have made it more interesting.
 
Sarcasmo said:
The spire is needed to make it 1,776 feet tall. They didn't want the floorspace to rise any higher, but wanted a symbolic total height. They probably could have made it more interesting.


Make the spire over hang to where we can lynch those terrorists when we catch them.