Ontopic Mission to Uranus

wetwille

Vegan Bow Hunter
May 24, 2018
9,892
11,181
273
59
Mid MIchigan
Marklar
53,753.48₥
Last edited:
  • Gravy
Reactions: Strings

fly

Osharts 11
Oct 1, 2004
67,046
19,378
823
Marklar
46,624.23₥
Steam
mattressfish
What I don't understand is how NASA couldn't theorize that the wind would blow the dust off those things. I'm shocked they didn't model the atmospheric conditions (accurately).
 

Jehannum

Eats bananas with the peel still on
Jul 24, 2013
31,354
31,672
723
Albuquerque, NM
Marklar
84,231.16₥
What I don't understand is how NASA couldn't theorize that the wind would blow the dust off those things. I'm shocked they didn't model the atmospheric conditions (accurately).
I expect their estimates are based on a worst case scenario, which is why they planned everything to take place during the first 90 days.
 

Mr. Asa

Extra Medium Tedium
Sep 27, 2012
45,334
18,065
473
Tampa-ish
Marklar
61,341.03₥
Steam
asastang
Fairly sure they did predict it would happen, but that little guy went 60 times past his original mission time. Even a best case was probably a year.

I would hope that with the next models they design panels that could rotate in such a way that dust wouldn't accumulate, but some will still do so from the static generated by the dust storms.

Even that idea has problems though.
 

Jehannum

Eats bananas with the peel still on
Jul 24, 2013
31,354
31,672
723
Albuquerque, NM
Marklar
84,231.16₥
Fairly sure they did predict it would happen, but that little guy went 60 times past his original mission time. Even a best case was probably a year.

I would hope that with the next models they design panels that could rotate in such a way that dust wouldn't accumulate, but some will still do so from the static generated by the dust storms.

Even that idea has problems though.
Given the size trend, I think they'll probably stick with the RTG for the next few.