G
I like most of what I see but I don't agree with all of what I see.generalcliche said:
L
Lynnakitty
Guest
G
generalcliche
Guest
Most of what PJ added to the movie I like. The problem for me is in the details. For instant I like that they added the confrontation between Gandalf and Saruman. What I don't like are the details of the scene such as where Saruman is in the scene. The use of open magic. Tolkien only used magic very sparingly in the books.generalcliche said:What do you mean?
Mean Mr. Mustard
Always shouts out something obscene
G
generalcliche
Guest
Neither can I. I just hope that they haven't altered it from the books any more, even though it looks like hollywood has "enhanced" itDrool-Boy said:
Mean Mr. Mustard
Always shouts out something obscene
generalcliche said:Neither can I. I just hope that they haven't altered it from the books any more, even though it looks like hollywood has "enhanced" it
Im willing to overlook most of that. Otherwise the movies would be about 9hrs each
That wouldn't bother me a bit. What irritates me the most is PJ's changing of characters motivations especially Aragorn's and Gandalf. The other thing that irritates is how PJ portrays the love affair between Arwen and Aragorn,Drool-Boy said:Im willing to overlook most of that. Otherwise the movies would be about 9hrs each
M
Mondoz
Guest
G
generalcliche
Guest
Amen to that, but you know how hollywood distorts things. Its still a good movie, but involves too much creative license on the part of PJ, and does not do the book justice.Findakáno said:
Which is why I have a wait and see attitude about King Kong. He says that it will be like the classic Fay Ray version but I will believe it when I see it.generalcliche said: