Pandora said:Why do you think I was pushing his Shat button? andora:
Edit:
To watch me go! To watch me go!
brat
Pandora said:Why do you think I was pushing his Shat button? andora:
Edit:
ChikkenNoodul said:Shat DID play that beauty pageant host in Miss Congeniality, and didn't even ogle any of those chicks ( Particularly Ms. Bullock )
Yeah, I'm pretty sure he's walking the pink line
BigDov said:GODDAMMIT!!!! For starters, I love dick so you can't hold that against me...
BigDov said:I hate you
ChikkenNoodul said:
Scotty was straight, at least you can console yourself with that
ChikkenNoodul said:
Scotty was straight, at least you can console yourself with that
some Star Trek board I googled said:Well, George may be gay, if the article is accurate, but Mr. Sulu may not be. Actually, Mr. Sulu isn't, since he had a daughter.
I mean, we can't let the actor's sexuality color his characters', or else every character played by Sir Lawrence Olivier would be gay, and that would be really weird, since he played lots of non-gay characters.
It works the other way around, too. Patrick Stewart once played a gay character, but he certainly isn't gay, as far as I know. Same with Hal Sparks.
Now... can we discuss GEORGE, and HIS being gay, and FORGET I SAID SULU AS A SNYONYM FOR GEORGE?
Another quote:
Personally, I want to see some of the medias response. I wanna hear Shatner's. LOL. Not to mention that, I believe, George is the first homosexual actor in Trek, so that really stirs that pot. I mean, it might make some close-minded Trekkies realize, "My god... he's not a freak! He's just a person! The same actor I'd liked all these years is actually a normal human being who happens to have a different sexuality. He's not a monster or a sinner or a freak of nature or a diseased person. He's just a person."
I've got to think that, wherever Gene is, whatever he thought of homosexuals in life, he is smiling down on George right now. Same with De and Jimmy. Even if they, themselves, in life did not like homosexuals, where homophobic, from the point of view of the great beyond, they likely now realize the reality of it.
We now know the UFP ship U.S.S. Defiant from the TOS episode "The Tholian Web" reappeared in the Mirror Universe a 100 years earlier after we saw the Defiant vanish.
But suppose the ship instead had disappeared millions of years into the past & across the vast intergalactic gulfs to the SW Galaxy & time? I was thinking about this lately & thought how cool it would be to see SW people,Empire or Rebel,or preferably Rebel in this case,discovering the 23rd Century USS DEFIANT,& the implications of it.
I assume SW Galaxy citizens would figure out the Defiant was from this universe due to whatever their version of checking quantum signature is. But I'm sure the SW folks would also find out the Defiant was from the future & some unknow area of either their galaxy or somewhere else in the universe,due to a temporal heat study.
This is a location/reality the Defiant could have ended up in when it vanished,maybe? Whose to say the Defiant didn't also end up in the SW Time/Galaxy also? On ST,we've seen quantum replications,transporter duplicates,& other instances of literal exact copies of a thing made [IE:Riker] due to strange accidents of technology or due to the universe's unpredictability.
So,maybe I/we/some of us,can have our cake & eat it too regarding the fantasy in this post. Maybe when the TOS Defiant vanished,it simultaneously reappeared on the Other Side a century before the infamous Halkan Transporter Incident, & also in the deep past in this universe far away in the SW Galaxy/Time a little after the events of Revenge of the Sith.
It would make an awesome episode of that proposed SW TV Series thats supposed to come on in 2 years if they made an episode featuring STAR TREK's TOS U.S.S. DEFIANT as I envision/talk about in this here post. You'd see SW folk dressed in 23rd Century Starfleet uniforms & hanging out in that boardroom with the UFP flag behind them.
What do YOU think of this topic?
ALL opinions|viewpoints welcome here.