Great Interview with the "Messiah"

Arátoeldar said:
Because I know that he is lying through his teeth. All have to do look at who his friends are, what he has done in the past, what he has said before he won the Democrat nomination for president.
Click to expand...

Then start posting some links to back this shit up, because, really, the only people I hear spouting this argument are right wing conservative gun nuts who have an issue with a black man being their president.
 
The Duke Of Nuke said:
Then start posting some links to back this shit up, because, really, the only people I hear spouting this argument are right wing conservative gun nuts who have an issue with a black man being their president.
Click to expand...

picture.php
IF J.C. Watt was running I would have no problems voting for him. It has nothing to do with Obama's race but his ideology.

If you can't even understand the words coming out of his own mouth and what they mean for you. I feel sorry for you and this great nations. Because it is uniformed people like you that will elect him to the presidency.
 
Arátoeldar said:
picture.php
IF J.C. Watt was running I would have no problems voting for him. It has nothing to do with Obama's race but his ideology.

If you can't even understand the words coming out of his own mouth and what they mean for you. I feel sorry for you and this great nations. Because it is uniformed people like you that will elect him to the presidency.
Click to expand...

That's why I am saying post some links to back this shit up. Trust me, I am PLENTY informed on both of the candidates, because my vote is fucking precious, and I won't waste it.

And this fear mongering of your regarding Obama's desire to repeal the first and second amendments is pretty much baseless crap. So, if I am so uninformed, as you say, then 'inform' me by posting the information you keep saying is out there.

As the old line goes 'Links, or it didn't happen'.

Cause I find stuff like this

Campaigning at Iowa's Cornell College on Dec. 5, he asserted that the Second Amendment "is an individual right and not just a right of the militia." He has repeated that formulation along the primary trail, declaring at a Milwaukee news conference before the Feb. 19 Wisconsin primary: "I believe the Second Amendment means something. . . . There is an individual right to bear arms."
Click to expand...

and this

In 2006, he voted with an 84 to 16 majority (and against Clinton) to prohibit confiscation of firearms during an emergency,
Click to expand...

That pretty much tell me that this concept of him being all about repealing the second amendment is a load of bullshit.

Bring something to the table that is concrete, and not the conservative bias spun heavily in some kind of rabid swift boat tactic.
 
They don't destroy the guns. That's a lie designed to foster a sense of security. I know, because I know how it works. They hand them out to their friends and family members.

"John, you busy tonight? I thought maybe you could swing by for a beer and 20,000 handguns."

Don't let them fool you.
 
As McCain so eloquently pointed out, nothing. THAT socialism was in response to an emergency. Emergent socialism is just band-aid capitalism.
 
w_a_w said:
yeah, they blew the lid of that on headline news this morning...it's fucking shameful that both sides(it appears to be mostly mccain however) resort to tactics like this....there should be some sort of penalties for this like losing an electoral college vote for every lie you disseminate out to the public
Click to expand...

There's only like 400 sumthin votes... Everyone would have zero
 
fly said:
There's only like 400 sumthin votes... Everyone would have zero
Click to expand...

there needs to be some sort of legitimate and costly repercussions for blatantly lying to the public over the biggest and most important election in the world...it's not right...we're okay with ending up with the person who can lie the most??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back