Yes she's a bitch and I feel for the man who got hit but who the fuck are these wankers driving around following, recording and criticizing bad drivers?
Car customizer/enthusiasts.
Yes she's a bitch and I feel for the man who got hit but who the fuck are these wankers driving around following, recording and criticizing bad drivers?
I suppose being married now has nothing to do with your "refined taste" or anything.
Assemblyman Joe Lentol's yeah for gay marriage gets him a nay from church
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...gets_him_a_nay_from_church.html#ixzz1RXXr3OSy
A Brooklyn Catholic school rejected a local assemblyman's donation - saying they couldn't take the cash because he voted to legalize gay marriage.
Congrats Catholics
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol..._gay_nups_yea_gets_him_a_nay_from_church.html
At least they are sticking to their beliefs and not letting money get in the way. Now they can pay their taxes on their buildings and services they use of the cities as well as giving back money they have taken as donations from other politicians to get votes swayed.
Either way some boy in NY is getting it in the ass today from a priest.
Either way some boy in NY is getting it in the ass today from a priest.
The play by play losing it was just awesome.
Baseball is just boring to watch
LBGT organizations are tax exempt as well.Congrats Catholics
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol..._gay_nups_yea_gets_him_a_nay_from_church.html
At least they are sticking to their beliefs and not letting money get in the way. Now they can pay their taxes on their buildings and services they use of the cities as well as giving back money they have taken as donations from other politicians to get votes swayed.
...government is to see to it that equality of citizens before the law, which is itself an element of the common good, is never violated, whether openly or covertly, for religious reasons. Nor is there to be discrimination among citizens.
- a child born in 1860 was more likely to be raised by his mother and father in a two-parent household than was an African-American baby born after the election of the USA’s first African-American President.
Not only do I like the implication that black families were totally better under slavery (nevermind the rape, beatings, forced work, inhumane living conditions, and the fact that slave owners regularly split up families just to make more money), but bonus points for implying that as the first African-American president that it’s somehow Obama’s fault.
- Vigorous opposition to any redefinition of the Institution of Marriage – faithful monogamy between one man and one woman – through statutory-, bureaucratic-, or court-imposed recognition of unions which are bigamous, polygamous, polyandrous, same-sex, etc.
Read: opposition to the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government should they require Americans to treat other married or non-monogamous couples as equal. Anyone married person who is not straight and fucking only one person for the rest of their lives doesn’t deserve the rights or legal protections of marriage.
- Earnest, bona fide legal advocacy for the Defense of Marriage Act at the federal and state levels.
Because the government has thousands and thousands of taxpayer dollars to oppose the rights of states to create their own marriage laws and treat their own committed, hardworking citizens as equals. We need to prosecute and keep queers down, no matter the costs, even though it doesn’t help create jobs, helps tear families apart, and leaves kids rotting in state care.
- Steadfast embrace of a federal Marriage Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which protects the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman in all of the United States.
That is she first wants to bungle up the bicameral houses of Congress by forcing both to reach a two-thirds majority vote on a constitutional amendment that’s increasingly unpopular with Americans and then force states to fight over the proposed amendment when all its most likely to do is precipitate an atmosphere of violence against LGBT people rather “protect” marriage. If she was serious about protecting marriage, she’d wanna an amendment banning divorce.
- Human protection of women and the innocent fruit of conjugal intimacy – our next generation of American children – from human trafficking, sexual slavery, seduction into promiscuity, and all forms of pornography and prostitution, infanticide, abortion, and other types of coercion or stolen innocence.
Ban all porn. Good luck getting the male vote. And what better way to protect women than to deny their right to reproductive health, force them to have unwanted kids, and drive them to back alley abortions that could potentially kill them? Awesome. Totally pro-woman, that Michele.
- Rejection of Sharia Islam and all other anti-woman, anti-human rights forms of totalitarian control.
Yeah, let’s ban Muslim teachings by first painting calling them all violent and misogynist. After all, we wouldn’t want religious fundamentalists making us all follow their laws, right?
- That practices such as adultery, bisexuality, homosexuality, anal intercourse, group sex, promiscuity, serial marriage, polygamy, polyandry, and extramarital sex individually or collectively lead to general improvements in: HIV, E Coli, Hepatitis, Chancroid, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Herpes simplex, genital warts, HPV, pubic lice, scabies, anal incontinence, and abortion.
Yeah, sleeping with more than one person will the rest of your life will result in HPV, herpes, abortion, and worst of all ANAL INCONTINENCE. None of those things will ever happen to you if you fuck just one person forever.
She just dq'd herself.
Republicans = small government, right?