UL/ULC are the exact same tests, different set of paperwork, at least for electronic devices that plug into the wall. We get them at the same time and I consider them the same thing.except for canada which requires a ULC mark(same co as UL though)
they kill themselves in america and they're done. point is, i don't see it happening.
it kept functioning, but the LCD on it couldnt take it.
No one seemed to care about your story, so I thought I'd post what it reminded me of
I was looking forward to doing that testing, but the device I was testing never made it past IA testing. When it combined CBRN sensor output with location and time, the output became classified, and so the device itself became a controlled item. Not a great thing for a device that was intended to be camped out remotely with various CBRN point detectors. Instead of copper ground plates, it had a big aluminum base that acted as both heat sink and ground plane.you ever been to one of the big facilities that throws 300k-1.5M kv at a device? through the air. The infrastructure for that is ridiculous, and kind of scary.
I had to once get something through helicopter backwash testing, which produces between 100-300kv, airborne. The device had to keep functioning in that environment. Half the weight of the thing, which was weight sensitive i might add was 5oz copper ground planes to attenuate all that.
It still failed
