Oh sweet, the circumcision argument :>
Here is what I know: I have a close friend who had to get circumcised for medical reasons when he was 14, basically his foreskin was too tight and couldn't be fully retracted.
So he got the snip. First thing he noticed was the loss of sensitivity, the head of his penis rubbing against his underwear all day was initially very painful but soon became tolerable and eventually he started not to notice it. That can only say one thing, circumcision significantly lowers sensitivity.
Now of course he was in a pretty unique position to have experienced 'both ways' and while he is on the whole happy with his penis these days he does complain about the fact that masturbation doesn't feel as good as it used to.
As for myself, uncircumcised and happy - I don't think I was even aware that it was a normal thing to do to your children in the states until I was around 15-16. It does seem like an odd practice but I guess its just a cultural difference. Of course, if I had one of those freak foreskins which are either too small or too big or dont retract when hard (now thats fucking horrible looking) I might think differently about my penis but as it stands i'm happy with what nature decided would be best for my junk.
Cleanliness is a complete non issue for 95% of the developed world, surely we all shower at least once a day?
A properly working
lol
uncircumcised penis should only really appear significantly different to a circumcised penis when flaccid, when hard the foreskin should either retract to make up for the additional length on its own or with a bit of assistance.
The one big downside that i've heard about however is the possibility of breaking the frenulum... i've heard stories and they scare me.