Ontopic [Conspiracy Time!] CNN for hire?

[ZRH]

I make over $50k a year. No way in hell would I qualify for anything

If you had 7 or more dependents you probably could.

 

[123]

Thats not even a response.

More of a response than "lol"

 

[Coqui]

Thats not even a response.

Yes it was.

 

[Amstel]

Then social security is welfare too.

I would argue against this only because we supposedly put $$ into this and are rewarded later because of it.

 

[123]

Yes it was.

You understand that saying?

 

[Coqui]

If you had 7 or more dependents you probably could.

Nope just checked. Still didn't qualify.

 

[Coqui]

You understand that saying?

It was English.

 

[123]

It was English.

ahhh gotcha.

 

[Coqui]

ahhh gotcha.

Correct me if I was wrong, but I assumed it meant that you thought, "He's finally getting it"

 

[ZRH]

I would argue against this only because we supposedly put $$ into this and are rewarded later because of it.

You put $$ into medicare, medicaid, TANF, SNAP etc. as well.

 

[ZRH]

Correct me if I was wrong, but I assumed it meant that you thought, "He's finally getting it"

It means "I can't think of anything to say so I'm going to post random gibberish and hope it looks cool"

 

[123]

Correct me if I was wrong, but I assumed it meant that you thought, "He's finally getting it"

more like "Look at you, you clever boy, you!".

 

[123]

It means "I can't think of anything to say so I'm going to post random gibberish and hope it looks cool"

sorry to disappoint you.

 

[Amstel]

You put $$ into medicare, medicaid, TANF, SNAP etc. as well.

I didn't know that was specifically part of the withdrawals.

 

[Coqui]

I didn't know that was specifically part of the withdrawals.

It's the first deduction listed in your statutory deductions

 

[123]

Hm...









I'd say yes.

Funny how you leave out the original post.

 

[ZRH]

...

 

[ZRH]

It's the first deduction listed in your statutory deductions

This.

and

Some states have a co-payment of state allocated funds which are withheld from paychecks.

 

[Duke]

...

oh look, he was wrong again.

But he'll claim 'dual post' or some bullshit.

 

[my little brony]

you can't ignore what's you can't see.

we have a two party system. hmmm,

news coverage:

Republicans never expected to get a fair shake in the Big Three networks' coverage of the 16-day government shutdown, but the final tally of stories blaming the GOP is stunning: 41 stories blamed Republicans and zero blamed Democrats.


Nightly, 20 million Americans heard “a version of the shutdown story that could easily have emanated from Barack Obama's own White House,” said the new report from the Media Research Center.
The report, provided to Secrets, found that a total of 41 stories blamed Republicans for the shutdown. None blamed the Democrats. Another 17 blamed both sides.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/networks-blamed-shutdown-on-gop-41-stories-0-for-dems/article/2537363

this is what I'm talking about

you're given facts

and you want to draw your own incorrect conclusions from it

just like you were given facts on climate change but you want to draw your own conclusions

just like you were given facts on evolution but you want to draw your own conclusions

just like you were given facts on homosexuality but you want to draw your own conclusions

just like you were given facts on gun violence but you want to draw your own conclusions

you, and many others, are notorious for drawing your own conclusions that go against the facts. people do not get to decide their own facts, people do not get to dictate reality, people do not get to determine what is a fabrication. hell, if people could make the choice regarding what fabrications were real then religion wouldn't be mythological