Avatars for UF

Pandora

Flaccid Member
Oct 19, 2004
7,656
0
0
Atlanta GA!
skewed.textamerica.com
Marklar
₥0
I would support av's under these conditions:

1) they MUST UNQUESTIONABLY be SFW.
2) members must be able to disable them
3) all the other trophy and gift bs goes cuz that would be waaay too much crap

As 'nifty' an idea as this sounds I don't think it's a wise one. Elpie promises to screen questionable content, yet he has "goat f'er' in his title...that's questionable to me. I thought we weren't suppose to have that kinda stuff in thread titles n'stuff. Yet people have them in their personal titles which are always visible in every thread....??? And who is determining the standard for questionable content here, elpie? fly? :lol: Luv ya guys but your standards on questionable content is pretty damn low...below sea level even. It'd be nice to think that we'd all play nice and be respectful of each other, but people still violate the NSFW image rule now! If people don't respect that rule now it won't be respected later when there's more avenues of expression. And as theac pointed out, the moment someone's avatar gets rejected for being questionable there will be a shit fit. We've had enough drama in our threads over rules as it is. I vote for less BS via no avatars.
 

simple

Giant Member
Sep 30, 2004
12,258
14
533
^_^
Marklar
₥5
Pandora said:
I would support av's under these conditions:

1) they MUST UNQUESTIONABLY be SFW.
2) members must be able to disable them
3) all the other trophy and gift bs goes cuz that would be waaay too much crap

As 'nifty' an idea as this sounds I don't think it's a wise one. Elpie promises to screen questionable content, yet he has "goat f'er' in his title...that's questionable to me. I thought we weren't suppose to have that kinda stuff in thread titles n'stuff. Yet people have them in their personal titles which are always visible in every thread....??? And who is determining the standard for questionable content here, elpie? fly? :lol: Luv ya guys but your standards on questionable content is pretty damn low...below sea level even. It'd be nice to think that we'd all play nice and be respectful of each other, but people still violate the NSFW image rule now! If people don't respect that rule now it won't be respected later when there's more avenues of expression. And as theac pointed out, the moment someone's avatar gets rejected for being questionable there will be a shit fit. We've had enough drama in our threads over rules as it is. I vote for less BS via no avatars.
someone bought me that title sweetheart, I didn't do it myself
 

Sarcasmo

A Taste Of Honey Fluff Boy
Mar 28, 2005
34,396
464
648
45
Austin
Marklar
₥663
Pandora said:
I know that sweetcheeks I was just pointing out the fact that it was there. ;)

If you replace the 'B' in your title with the 'n' from your name it says Naked Lady, but that's okay I guess. Hypocrite.
 

simple

Giant Member
Sep 30, 2004
12,258
14
533
^_^
Marklar
₥5
theacoustician said:
I was actually being serious. It didn't mean to sound like a smartass.
she gets in to it with forum members in real life, goes crazy and leaves for awhile

I think she just recently started posting a little bit again
 

thrawn

Flaccid Member
Oct 13, 2004
14,850
0
0
Marklar
₥0
elpmis said:
If you didn't have sex with Bubbles

Then I didn't have sex with fly



Hot damn. It was a great night, I don't remember much with all the drinking and heroin. But what I remember was AMAZING.