Jehannum
Puts the "pro" in procrastination
It's about the same as my shit tier Motorola. Just like all the other camera phones out there.The camera is fucking amazing.
It's about the same as my shit tier Motorola. Just like all the other camera phones out there.The camera is fucking amazing.
I'm totally sure it is.It's about the same as my shit tier Motorola. Just like all the other camera phones out there.
This.The best camera is the one you've got on hand. Suffice to say 99% of my picture taking is with my camera phone.
99% of what I'm doing is macro (which is apparently like telephoto but in reverse?) & I know that if I had a legit camera and legit macro lens and knew what I was doing, I could get some bomb ass photos & even fuck around with stacking, but I don't have the base knowledge necessary for all of the settings (I've looked it up, but it just will not stick in my head), and the shots I get with my phone are "good enough" to where I don't think I would personally manage to do any better with a real camera, though I can acknowledge that someone who knew what they were doing totally could. #4 for real tho, I do have a "pro" setting on my current phone camera that lets you tweak things like ISO, but it's not very easy to use quickly like having physical dials/buttons are, & I've never done a better job with my tweaks (which again, is on me) except fucking around and taking 50 attempts to get a single shot of a sunset that approximates what I seent with my eyes3) Zoomy stuff like taking pictures of birds in trees from a distance. Hard to beat big glass for that stuff.
4) Being able to adjust aperture/shutter/zoom/focus/whatever across a bunch of controls with your fingers while looking through the viewfinder while you're setting up a shot... doing that same shit on a cellphone screen is a pain in the ass.
Apparently these are macro-ish?99% of what I'm doing is macro (which is apparently like telephoto but in reverse?) & I know that if I had a legit camera and legit macro lens and knew what I was doing, I could get some bomb ass photos & even fuck around with stacking, but I don't have the base knowledge necessary for all of the settings (I've looked it up, but it just will not stick in my head), and the shots I get with my phone are "good enough" to where I don't think I would personally manage to do any better with a real camera, though I can acknowledge that someone who knew what they were doing totally could. #4 for real tho, I do have a "pro" setting on my current phone camera that lets you tweak things like ISO, but it's not very easy to use quickly like having physical dials/buttons are, & I've never done a better job with my tweaks (which again, is on me) except fucking around and taking 50 attempts to get a single shot of a sunset that approximates what I seent with my eyes
I was warming it up for later.yeah, just wiping a tasty snack on the laptop like that?
Apparently these are macro-ish?
So much more photogenic than my boogers.here's two unedited pics I took with my phone of the same lady that are similar shots - top is with the 2x lens that's part of my phone*, bottom is with the regular/main 1x phone lens and clip-on macro lens (I CAN clip it on the 2x as well, but it's ULTRAzoomy so there won't be anything comparable & the DOF is crazy small)
View attachment 15187
post your very best DSLR photo.So, I totally get that the convenience factor of a camera phone.
And I appreciate the effort the software guys have put in to make those pictures look better than a photo with vaseline smeared over it too.
If that's your thing, jam on.
I just find it silly the way some kids around here strut around when they've got the "best" camera phone on the market. But then again, I also think Joe Rogan is a moron and Dave Chappelle isn't that funny.