WTF And people call the US legal system retarded!

DJBrenton

In Her Majesty's Secret Cervix
Feb 10, 2010
9,402
3,321
273
Robin Hoodland
Marklar
₥1,984
Well maybe they don't but certainly the UK legal system is an ass in this case.

Over here a celeb can get a super injunction. That's an injunction against anyone publishing certain information + an injunction against anyone even publishing that there IS an injunction.


So we have a football player who's been playing away wiTHan ex Big Brother contestant and then obtains a super injuncton. A few problems here.


1 The injunction only applies to England and Wales ( his legal advisors obviously didn't realise something we all know - the Scottish legal system is, in most cases, separate.

2 The rest of the world can publish. This pretty much also means the internet ( as long as the servers aren't in England or Wales). The information is all over Twitter etc and is therefore common knowledge anyway

3 There's something called parliamentary privilege. Thats is to say that MPs can say anything they like in the House and are immune from prosecution. The press can then ( possibly) report on whatever is said in parliament.


So it is illegal at the moment to print that the player concerned is Ryan Giggs ( Man Utd and Wales ) but it''s legal to report that this information has been presented in parliament.

As a result of this super injunction, what would have been a minor story of a married footballers infidelity has become the highhest treneded tweet in the UK. Excellent spend of around £200,000 on legal fees that man.

giggs1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Giggsy!!!

One of the best there's ever been! Let the guy wet his end in peace people! Then again, how hard is it to have an affair without the press knowing? Arnold did it for 15+ years before the press found out.
 
Only people who can afford a minimum of £50,000 or so in barrister fees. The argument is that whilst the story may be 'of interest' to the public, it isn't 'in the public interest'. The EU has a Right To Privacy law that can only be infringed if it is 'in the public interest'.
 
Only people who can afford a minimum of £50,000 or so in barrister fees. The argument is that whilst the story may be 'of interest' to the public, it isn't 'in the public interest'. The EU has a Right To Privacy law that can only be infringed if it is 'in the public interest'.

Not sure I have a problem with the. The press has gotten way to intrusive into lives lately. The moment anyone pops up on a radar, the press feels it has open season because 'now that they are in the public, they are of public interest'...

Scandal. All about scandal anymore.
 
Not sure I have a problem with the. The press has gotten way to intrusive into lives lately. The moment anyone pops up on a radar, the press feels it has open season because 'now that they are in the public, they are of public interest'...

Scandal. All about scandal anymore.

But you obviously can't, and really shouldn't, legislate that away. The press is too important.
 
THese days, the press just follow money. Where ever they can make the biggest buck, that's where they'll be.