Halp Tardwheel Political Circle Jerkoff 2017
- Thread starter Valve1138
- Start date
- Status
OK I think the confusion is in that there are multiple parts of a thing to object to
there are the actions/words/platforms themselves - it's not necessarily hypocritical just because someone supports or agrees with something you don't, obviously. it MAY be hypocrisy dependent upon other factors.
one example of hypocrisy would be people who complained about something one party does while allowing it from their own (e.g. lying). this can get complicated obviously because people disagree on what lies are or what are lies, or because people assume someone was OK with their own party's lying just because they can't recall having seen them complain about it, etc
your response up there is ridiculously reductive and I think you know it
it's basically a rehashing of the same
"you're not wrong because I disagree with you, I disagree with you because you're wrong" argument we've already been through a thousand times here
"you're not wrong because I disagree with you, I disagree with you because you're wrong" argument we've already been through a thousand times here
Actually, he is EXACTLY the anti-Christ. He does not forgive. He does not help the homeless or poor or hungry. He does not help other before himself. He does not treat others with respect. He does not donate to charity. Not one of his policies has a positive impact on humanity.
When the current leader DAILY stops insulting/hurting/terrorizing others. So Obama might have lied in situations, but his lies and deceptions didn't actively hurt large percentages of the population on a daily basis.
Obama's security was by far the most expensive ever. He had to have twice the security as other Presidents before him. At this point, they have cut funding so much for secret service, they have had to lay people off.
also there is a false dichotomy in assuming someone anti trump/GOP is automatically pro Obama/Hillary/Dem, and making assumptions about the folks here and where they fall politically or what they have or haven't said or believed about whoever you assume they support is a poor base for arguments. judge folks on what they're actually saying here and not because you're lumping anyone who says x about y into those who do or don't say p about q if p and q aren't part of the set
do your own homework. yeah, I know proving a negative is harder, but have you actually looked at old posts? or are you just making assumptions?
Foolhardy and opportunistic, more like. It's baiting for better economic deals between China and Taiwan and the US. He can use that strategy to negotiate better deals. Nothing compassionate about that. Courageous, perhaps. Then again you can call the first person who bungee jumped "courageous", too.
because Trump is the current leader of the country, it makes sense that what he is up to, bad or otherwise, would be more likely to be discussed. we're not exactly discussing Carter r Reagan at length in this thread about current politics, either.
Petition: @Mustard Dispenser plz lock this thread and ban any political talk forum wide for one week. It'll improve the forum immensely.
Gravies represent the undersigned.
Gravies represent the undersigned.
i like that all the political shit is in one festering pile that I can ignore if I choose to.
nukes
I Eat Buttholes Raw
Not going to happen. This place is so lightly moderated, if you create work for the mod/admin, you will be banned. Trust me, I of all people know that.
Mean Mr. Mustard
Always shouts out something obscene
If I mail you a roll of duct tape will you use it to seal your mouth and asshole shut?
- Status