HAHAHAHAHAHA
Every link in this thread is anti-liberal, and pro-conservative. Tell me again where the assumption is wrong here.
You would think a <ahem> "black" President would at least try to turn these numbers around. Øbama? Remains silent. And Mrs. Øbama? She talks about gardens and healthy food. She should be talking about responsible behavior on the part of parents.....and the children.
So what I gather is that you want government to be responsible for raising your children? Oh wait, never mind. I see that's just a way to blame Obama. Gotcha.
Obama is a socialist/marxist long before he actually cares about the plight average black family.
Obama is a socialist/marxist long before he actually cares about the plight average black family.
Come to America and get rich.
Prosecutor: Store owner accused of massive food-stamp fraud also had government assistance for his family
After reporting low income and virtually no assets, the government says, Ahmed Sheikh Mohamed got help for food, housing, heating, medical treatment and college costs for his family.
He didn't disclose that his small Grand Rapids grocery store deposited $800,000 from 2006 to 2009. Or, that he made $60,000 annually in food-stamp fraud. Or, that he routinely moved cash in a business account to an account for personal spending, which included a $15,000 family vacation in Mecca, the government said.....
This man and his family scammed the system. Where did he learn to do this? Where are the GOVERNMENT employees charged with preventing this type of fraud? How many others are doing the same (or similar) thing?
http://media.mlive.com/grpress/news_impact/photo/ahmed-sheikh-mohamed-1jpg-d11f745272264377.jpg
From the Article:
The government alleged $474,000 in food-stamp fraud.
It also said Mohamed and his family wrong received $46,605 in SNAP benefits; $4,313 in Women, Infant and Children benefits; $44,873 in rent subsidies; $57,963 in Medicaid benefits; $300 in emergency heating assistance; and $24,678 in Pell Grants.
Proof positive of why no one's taxes should be raised. NOT ONE DIME....until this type of fraud is eliminated from our federal budget.
Nearly every national chain is under legal attack in California for failing to provide "suitable seating" for cashiers and other employees who are expected to spend most of their work day on their feet.
It was a case of bureaucracy run amok, at least from the perspective of the children operating a lemonade stand for charity near the U.S. Open.
Kids from two families put up the stand on private property -- a neighbor's yard that just happens to be on a corner across from a spectator entrance to Congressional.
During Thursday's first round, they received three visits from county officials, twice with a warning. The third time, a citation was issued for operating the stand without a permit. It carried a fine of up to $500 and required a court appearance.