GAY RELUBRICANTS Where are you now? lulz

shamwow said:
you pseudo republicans are a hoot. the richest 400 people in this country make something like 80% of the money. you're one of the proletariat just like the rest of us though you're too blind to see it.
Click to expand...

Not at all. I actually think they should end the tax cuts as well as cut down on government programs like homeland security. We need both, not one or the other, and right now we are doing the exact opposite on both ends.
 
plot said:
I agree. We are where we are by our own faults.

When government steps into private bussiness it ends up saving banks that deserve to fail from their own corrupt bussiness practices.
Click to expand...

Since bank accounts are insured by the FDIC, the public pays for corrupt business practices. How is that fair to let them fail? You know who wanted the banks to fail? Wealthy people.
 
Casper said:
Since bank accounts are insured by the FDIC, the public pays for corrupt business practices. How is that fair to let them fail? You know who wanted the banks to fail? Wealthy people.
Click to expand...

Fdic only covers so much. I doubt either of us are anywhere near that amount.
 
plot said:
An ill conceived service they are getting rid of instead of keeping forever just because its there already...

Really, any bussiness has to justify different positions and programs every so often and make difficult decisions if they aren't performing or are too costly, why should the government be any different? They started all these programs everywhere and spent spent spent when times were good, now everyone is crying about cutting back when times are bad. Government isnt going through anything different than what the private sector has been dealing with for the past few years... Its just at the speed of government its just now hitting them.
Click to expand...

As it stands, pre-existing conditions still exist for declining of coverage. Guess what would happen if he attempted to get private insurance?
 
dear god. common sense anyone?

trickle down.

$$$$ business owner works hard to make money. takes on risk. needs more employees to do it. Hires managers
$$$ managers take on risk to keep divisions producing profitably. must pay managed employees
$$ employees.

Go ahead & take away a $ from the owner. He grabs one from the managers who grab from the employees.

welcome to the game.
 
Amstel said:
dear god. common sense anyone?

trickle down.

$$$$ business owner works hard to make money. takes on risk. needs more employees to do it. Hires managers
$$$ managers take on risk to keep divisions producing profitably. must pay managed employees
$$ employees.

Go ahead & take away a $ from the owner. He grabs one from the managers who grab from the employees.

welcome to the game.
Click to expand...

You forgot the step where the business owner stops working hard and lives off of the work everyone else does. OMG socialism in the corporate world!

And if you disagree, think about it the next time your CEO decides on a whim to go golfing while we have to take a vacation day if we want to do the same.
 
Amstel said:
dear god. common sense anyone?

trickle down.

$$$$ business owner works hard to make money. takes on risk. needs more employees to do it. Hires managers
$$$ managers take on risk to keep divisions producing profitably. must pay managed employees
$$ employees.

Go ahead & take away a $ from the owner. He grabs one from the managers who grab from the employees.

welcome to the game.
Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with trickle-anything economics..
 
warren buffet and who else? he's the only advocate of higher taxes from that crew I've eve heard of. he pays less % wise than his assistant
 
Coqui said:
You forgot the step where the business owner stops working hard and lives off of the work everyone else does. OMG socialism in the corporate world!

And if you disagree, think about it the next time your CEO decides on a whim to go golfing while we have to take a vacation day if we want to do the same.
Click to expand...
I've seen those guys close enough in action to know that they work more hours than I do. They deal with stuff I have NO desire to be involved with.

The money, fame, parties, etc., not worth it to me.
 
Coqui said:
You forgot the step where the business owner stops working hard and lives off of the work everyone else does.
Click to expand...
oh the drama. after you finish whining, perhaps you could realize that these are the dividends of profitable risk taking.

Oh, and it's been my experience that the peons view it as 'stops working.' NOT that their opinion is reality based where the owner is still gambling his entire company on new products and ventures while the employees look forward to their next paycheck provided by the guy who you claim stopped working. Ignorance is bliss.

Coqui said:
And if you disagree, think about it the next time your CEO decides on a whim to go golfing while we have to take a vacation day if we want to do the same.
Click to expand...

lol @ 'on a whim.' see above.
 
Coqui said:
You forgot the step where the business owner stops working hard and lives off of the work everyone else does. OMG socialism in the corporate world!

And if you disagree, think about it the next time your CEO decides on a whim to go golfing while we have to take a vacation day if we want to do the same.
Click to expand...

:lol: you think ceos don't put in 80 hours a week just because they go golfing. Good ceos of large corps don't anyways...

As for bussiness owners, they took on a large amount of risk when they started thier own bussiness and put uo a shitload of effort up front. Those who take the risks reap the rewards... Theres also alot of failed bussiness owners out there that no one ever cries about. Whats stopping you from starting a bussiness? What advantage do others that do it have over you?

Why aren't you a ceo? You put in tonnes of extra time at the office and really go above and beyond what us required to run and drive a bussiness?

unless its a family owned company, most ceos aren't born into it. Those born with a silver spoon don't run companies, they just sit on the board of directors.

You really want the pressure of having hundreds or thousands of employees livliehoods ultimately hinge on your decisions? I don't envy my current ceo at all. Just like I don't envy obama either.
 
ChikkenNoodul said:
Gates, your boss (chuckle) and a few others that I'm not going to bother looking up right now.

Buffet also still lives in the modest house he bought in the 70's, doesn't he? :lol:
Click to expand...

Buffet still brings his own lunch to work because its cheaper. He realizes the value of a dollar invested today...
 
Amstel said:
dear god. common sense anyone?

trickle down.

$$$$ business owner works hard to make money. takes on risk. needs more employees to do it. Hires managers
$$$ managers take on risk to keep divisions producing profitably. must pay managed employees
$$ employees.

Go ahead & take away a $ from the owner. He grabs one from the managers who grab from the employees.

welcome to the game.
Click to expand...

that's not how it works. not even close.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back