I believe that people who feel they need to protect themselves at all times hold an adversarial "us vs them" mentality that creates problems in everyday life.
There is fairly sufficient evidence to contradict this statement, and you can actually thank WAW for posting it in the other thread. 315,000 people in Florida actively carry. Do you think that if all of those people went around with a chip on their shoulder looking for problems to fix, tried to be hero, or ended their arguments by flashing their weapon there wouldn't be all kinds of legal problems?
Every CCWer I've ever known is more polite in public and in their lives than most others. They say "please", "thank you", and "excuse me". They do not eyeball gangbangers, talk down to waiters in restaurants, and rarely (if ever) drink while carrying.
I personally don't act any different when I'm carrying then when I'm not, and the internet aside I am very polite person and probably "let things go" more often than I should.
I believe that people who don't have protection on them work harder to avoid conflict.
Also incorrect. A large part of most good pistol/CCW courses have a "mindset" section in which they teach to use brain first, your feet second, and your weapon after all other alternatives have been exhausted.
The guy who taught my CCW course said it best "I'd much rather run home as a coward then have to look into the eyes of the mother of the gangbanger I just killed".
I also believe that when conflict arises between unprotected people, the outcome is less drastic.
Not really, most interactions involving defensive use of a gun end up being non-lethal, you just never hear about them because they don't make the news. Also, in un-armed confrontation the ending is always the same: the bigger man wins, the smaller man gets beaten to a pulp or killed.
I must be wrong since so many people disagree, but those are my beliefs. I don't mind being wrong.
You aren't wrong, you're just uneducated.