View Full Version : Superman: The Epic Stalker
InnerMuse
07-06-2006, 03:09 PM
Warning: May contain spoilers...
So, I went to see Superman on our most patriotic day next to Election day and President's day (the last two of which, might I add, only the government employees get off. But I digress...) Al throughout the movie, I noticed thatSuperman is a stalker. If it were anyone but Superman who follows unsuspecting Lois Lane home, late night peeping tom activities on her and her family with his ex-ray vision, and eerily watching her in the elevator at the Daily Planet, he would be slapped with a restraining order. The Movie should have been titled, Superman: The Epic Stalker. Did anyone notice anthing else about the movie that was mildly amusing?
b_sinning
07-06-2006, 03:15 PM
I thought the stalking part was odd too. I hate the fact they screwed up the storyline. They screwed with Lois and Clark's relationship.
inline4
07-06-2006, 03:16 PM
are you jealous .. do you need a gay man following you around all the time, would that make you feel better??
CALLING DBZEAG TO THE THREAD...
or elpmis for that matter..
*edit* HI TO U!!!
BeerAd
07-06-2006, 03:17 PM
Now I have always felt the same way about this character you all come to love named SANTA CLAUS!!!
If you think about it you are actually bringing your kids to the mall and having them sit on some old mans lap that you dont even know. That isnt even getting to the part about how you started lying to your kid before his first birthday. Or the fact that if he was real he would be illegally breaking into your house to steal what little milk you have left and my "use while high" cookies. Oh yeah and I back you on the SuperManic too! lol
b_sinning
07-06-2006, 03:46 PM
SUPERMAN CANT HAVE KIDS
Exactly. That has always been a big question. Just acting like it's nothing screws with the history.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 03:48 PM
Why can't he have kids? Kryptonite-induced sterility?
b_sinning
07-06-2006, 03:50 PM
The whole question of Lois carrying a Kryptonian baby.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 03:55 PM
It would be half-Kryptonian, half human. I don't see what the big deal is. All it would do is float around in the womb for a while and then get pushed out. :iono:
elpmis
07-06-2006, 03:56 PM
When he went to Lois' house, he was probably checking in on his son just as much as he was Lois, I mean, it's Superman, surely he knew it was his kid the whole time, there was never anything in the movie that said he didn't know it was his kid (from what I recall)
FlamingGlory
07-06-2006, 03:56 PM
The whole question of Lois carrying a Kryptonian baby.
She would es'plode like in Alien.
InnerMuse
07-06-2006, 03:57 PM
The whole question of Lois carrying a Kryptonian baby.
Heh, yeah, when it kicked, there'd be a hole in her belly. I think it's funny that she's neurotic about his health.
A couple of other things my s.o. noticed -the Jesus references: his outstretched arms while ascending into heaven, the repetition of calling Superman the Savior, how very Semitic his features are and the son as a savior.
JPatrick
07-06-2006, 04:00 PM
It would be half-Kryptonian, half human. I don't see what the big deal is. All it would do is float around in the womb for a while and then get pushed out. :iono:
It would erupt out like the critter in the movie Alien.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 04:02 PM
It would erupt out like the critter in the movie Alien.
Why the fuck would that happen. :lol:
JPatrick
07-06-2006, 04:04 PM
Why the fuck would that happen. :lol:
Because it would look badass in a movie? Plus Lois deserves to die.
Why the fuck would that happen. :lol:
its strong. besides, interspecies breeding is usually impossible.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 04:12 PM
its strong. besides, interspecies breeding is usually impossible.
The human head weighs 8 pounds.
The human head weighs 8 pounds.
Bees can smell beer.
SpyderGST
07-06-2006, 04:27 PM
The whole question of Lois carrying a Kryptonian baby.
Let me preface this with "I am not a comic geek and have never actually read a Superman comic," but I remember in the movie that Clark Kent, as a child, was discovering his talents as he grew up.
Superman's kid, in Lois' womb, wouldn't have those skills, as it took sunlight to "activate?" the skills. So until the child is born and exposed to sunlight, super-baby would be a regular baby.
But that's just a guess.
Let me preface this with "I am not a comic geek and have never actually read a Superman comic," but I remember in the movie that Clark Kent, as a child, was discovering his talents as he grew up.
He wasn't in the womb with those skills, as it took sunlight to "activate?" the skills. So until he is born and exposed to sunlight, he would be a regular baby.
But that's just a guess.
I thought he came here after being born. No?
SpyderGST
07-06-2006, 04:30 PM
I thought he came here after being born. No?
True, by "he" I meant the kid...hold on lemmie go correct my reply :)
shawndavid
07-06-2006, 04:39 PM
Would the baby, upon 'sploding, do a nice little dance number?
"Hello my baby hello my honey...hello my ragtime gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal..."
BeerAd
07-06-2006, 04:45 PM
its strong. besides, interspecies breeding is usually impossible.
You do it with an Ape daily :eek:
InnerMuse
07-06-2006, 04:51 PM
Would the baby, upon 'sploding, do a nice little dance number?
"Hello my baby hello my honey...hello my ragtime gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaal..."
SPACEBALLS!
BWAHahahah! "She's gone from suck to blow!" *tear* makes me think of Mr. Miata... ;) :heart:
BeerAd
07-06-2006, 04:53 PM
"Is anyone in here not an ASSHOLE?"
You do it with an Ape daily :eek:
thankfully, we produce sterile offspring./
Desslock
07-06-2006, 05:17 PM
Actually, if you follow the current version of Superman from the comic books, his powers didn't start appearing till after puberty. If he was able to impregnate Lois the baby would probably be normal.
b_sinning
07-06-2006, 05:23 PM
This movie is suppose to take place after the second movie. In the second movie he slept with Lois after the machine in his fortress had turned him mortal.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 05:25 PM
This movie is suppose to take place after the second movie. In the second movie he slept with Lois after the machine in his fortress had turned him mortal.
What? What happened to Superman 3? It's now Superman 4?
Desslock
07-06-2006, 05:30 PM
What? What happened to Superman 3? It's now Superman 4?
Superman 5. There is a Superman 3 and 4.
b_sinning
07-06-2006, 05:33 PM
Pretty much the studio said 3 and 4 sucked so they didn't happen.
I liked 3 with Richard Pryor.
Desslock
07-06-2006, 05:38 PM
Pretty much the studio said 3 and 4 sucked so they didn't happen.
I liked 3 with Richard Pryor.
3 is Citizen Kane compared to 4.
Sarcasmo
07-06-2006, 06:07 PM
Pretty much the studio said 3 and 4 sucked so they didn't happen.
I liked 3 with Richard Pryor.
This is why Harry Potter is going to die. Rowling said she didn't want anyone to come along after she dies and inflict horrible plots and adventures on her characters. :fly:
Onnotangu
07-12-2006, 01:18 PM
the main outcry was the whole man of steel woman of tissue. and people kept thinking that if superjizz happens he would blow the top of her head clean off from the pressure.
InnerMuse
07-12-2006, 03:43 PM
the main outcry was the whole man of steel woman of tissue. and people kept thinking that if superjizz happens he would blow the top of her head clean off from the pressure.
Only if he pulls out. If he stays in, he's touching her and by proxy, she's invunerable. I heard somewhere that his suit became invunerable b/c of this. .. honestly, it is some strange theory and I can't recall the effing source.
To counter my own argument... (what? Don't look at me in that tone of voice!:P ) in the comics, his suit would get torn up, i.e. vs. Doomsday. So, that throws that argument right out the window.
b_sinning
07-12-2006, 04:16 PM
Some writers say Superman projects some form of forcefield right along his skin that protects him, his clothes typically, and passengers that he holds really close and that's how he can fly with someone while moving semi-fast.
Some other writers just say he wears special made outfits.
Onnotangu
07-13-2006, 05:48 PM
I wonder of he wears specialy made condoms.
b_sinning
07-13-2006, 05:50 PM
I wonder of he wears specialy made condoms.
Of course he does. He isn't called the Man of Steel for no reason.
I wonder of he wears specialy made condoms.
Obviously not, cause if he was using a condom Lois wouldn't have had his child.
Edit: Either that or he was wearing a condom but it was defective, which also proves it wasn't specially made.
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.